Since Jesus is being used to support questionable socio-religious attitudes towards targeted populations
Since Jesus is being
used to support questionable socio-religious attitudes towards targeted
populations such as women, Indigenous Peoples, racialized people, LGBTs and
immigrants from certain countries, let’s start with a common understanding of
what he DID NOT stand for… and what he actually DID do in his interactions with
marginalized people and with The System.
1) Jesus DID
NOT look down on people deemed unworthy or unholy. Backstory (Matt. 15): Jesus came specifically
to fulfill God’s promise to the ancient Israelites that He would visit them in
the form of a human being…basically giving them first dibs at the Kingdom. So
when a Syrian woman approached him for her daughter’s healing one would expect
him to deny her. His disciples certainly had no problem with that. They advised
him to send her away.
Jesus didn’t. First he
gave her the religious line. “I was
sent only to the people of Israel! They are like a flock of lost sheep”.
But the woman had a
quality even Jesus’ own people did not have: faith in him. So she persisted. “Dear woman”, he said, amazed. “You…
really do have a lot of faith. You will be given what you want.” No
discrimination. Not on basis of her hairstyle; dress; culture; religious
practices; or place of birth. He focused on what was important—her need
and her faith.
2) Jesus DID
NOT appeal to the state for help in fulfilling his mission.
He did what he was sent here
to do: show what love looked like in a way humans could relate. No need for
help from corrupt and unjust earthly systems. As a matter of fact when some
religious people warned him one day that Herod was coming after him, he neither
cowered nor tried to appease. You go tell that fox, he retorted, I will do what
I need to do today and any other day I choose. Fox, I’m told was a metaphor for
small-fry/insignificance. Later at his trial when Pilate tried to flex his
political muscles Jesus reminded him that he would have no power unless it was
given to him from God his Father.
3) Jesus DID
NOT abide by oppressive systems. Much like today, religion and politics had become deeply intertwined. The
state tried to keep the Jews from rebelling against occupation and the Jews—the
religious elite in particular—looked to the state to do their dirty work e.g.
crucifying Jesus. The state was only too willing to oblige: Jesus had become a
disruption to their cosy relationship with the religious elite.
Jesus was constantly
at odds with oppression. In response to the endless dietary laws and rules that
signified religious purity he remarked: ‘it’s not what goes into a person’s
mouth that makes them unclean, it’s what comes out of their mouth…their heart’.
In other words, stop focusing on people’s external qualities. Focus instead on
the “evil thoughts, murders,
adulteries, fornications,
thefts, false witness, blasphemies” of which even they themselves were also guilty.
thefts, false witness, blasphemies” of which even they themselves were also guilty.
He pointed out that
they were blocking the way to heaven when they themselves were not going to
enter. “You travel over land and sea
to win one follower”, he said, “(But) when you have done so, you make that
person twice as fit for hell as you are (Matt 23:1)”. Why? Their walk did not
match their talk. Instead, they laid “heavy burdens” on the people, blocking
the spiritual and personal liberation he (Jesus) offered.
No wonder the they delivered him up to be killed by the state. It was the
perfect quid pro quo!
Think about it.